Logo Words
Home arrow Insightology arrow tagsarrow Markets

Main Menu

Home
About us
Offerings
Practices
Knowledge
Conferences
Newsletter
Contact Us
Login


Insight Links 

 

Risk management

Publish and be wrong

Sleeping at work

Fingerprint test tells what a person has touched

A touch of generosity

You are checked in but your brain is tuned out

The nature of glass remains anything but clear

The future of sports TV

Eyes on you

Trying to save by increasing doctors' fees

 


 

 

 

 

 

About this Blog 

My name is Rajan Sambandam and my day job is Chief Research Officer at TRC. Insightful ideas interest me. Insightology is a place where ideas of interest to me are brought together. Regular sections include posts on interesting topics & research I have seen, book recommendations, people with insightful ideas and links to articles that are interesting. Subject areas include business, economics, psychology, science, technology and sports. If you have thoughts to share, feel free to send them to me at This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it .

 

Insightology

Tag >> Markets

Bubble Psychology

Posted by: Rajan Sambandam in Markets on

Are market bubbles inevitable? Virginia Postrel has an interesting column in The Atlantic that explores the topic and pretty much arrives at that conclusion. Lab experiments run by the Nobel Prize winning economist Vernon Smith have repeatedly shown the formation of market bubbles. But as traders gain experience the bubbles become less likely and eventually disappear. So it appears that experience can have a modifying effect on bubble formation. However, when market conditions change, even experienced traders stumble and bubbles form.


Obama or McCain? Part II

Posted by: Rajan Sambandam in PollsPoliticsMarkets on

To read the first part of this post click here. In that we discussed how to use the available information to predict a winner in the current presidential race. While the polls (including the poll average) gave a small edge to McCain at that time, the other measures gave a mixed picture with the combined measure giving Obama a slight edge. Since that post a month ago the race has changed quite a bit. In this post I will revisit those numbers to see where they stand, how they have changed and what that means when you track such numbers. In the next one we will look at the impact of race on the race, or the so called Bradley Effect.


Books: Against the Gods

Posted by: Rajan Sambandam in RiskMarketsEconomicsBooks on

Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk by Peter L. Bernstein 

Given what has been happening in the economy recently, this book (written ten years ago) provides an excellent foundation for understanding how we ended up here. In telling the story of risk, Bernstein focuses on how much people believe the past determines the future. The more we believe we understand the past, the more certain we are of what will happen in the future. Quantifying the past helps enormously in bringing certainty to the future. But risk lurks in the shadows surrounding certainty and underestimating it because of our blind faith in numbers and computers can lead, he says, to disaster. But what makes this book a wonderful read is that it really does tell a story stretching back millennia and is populated with exotic places and interesting characters. For someone interested in this topic it is time well spent.


A question that is of great interest now and the common response tends to be "who's leading in the polls?". You often hear people say that the latest poll from some reputable organization shows one candidate with a 3 point lead. Is that the best measure we have of predicting who will win the Presidential election? I submit that it is not and will walk you through the different measures available and what is most likely the best one. I say most likely because nothing predicts the future with complete certainty. Further, the aim here is not to examine the political strategies used by the candidates or speculate on who has a better ground game. We just want to see what is the best way to predict the winner, using all publicly available information.